In this essay, the author seeks a definition of “radicalization” that can be operationalized, which is necessary but a challenge in itself for a few reasons.
The term has been around for many years, and has recently been used in work on extremism, fundamentalism, conspiracism, fanaticism, terrorism, and counter-terrorism, but in the face of its so widespread use and objections that have been presented against it, the author wonders about its exact meaning and current legitimacy of use.
A conception of radicalization that combines the four main approaches in the literature is defended, specifically referring to the monist and pluralist, as well as the absolutist and relativist ones. A conceptual analysis is used, case studies and “reflective equilibrium”.
The result is a comprehensive theoretical argument proposed by the author, a synthesis that aims to reduce apparent conflicting ideas around the notion.
Learn more about this essay here: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2185594
Reference
Peels, R. (2024). Towards a fruitful concept of radicalisation: a synthesis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(3), 610–624